Non copyleft free software licenses

Copyleft licenses are also called viral licenses, because they may potentially infect a software product with the opensource terms of the underlying copyleft program, leaving a. Whats the difference between permissive and copyleft. In fact, licenses are usually of such little interest that 85%of the projects on github fail to have one however, one aspect of licensing never fails to stir partisan responses. However, in actual practice nearly all copylefted software uses the gnu general public license. It is a non copyleft free software license which is incompatible with the gnu gpl, and has practical problems like those of the original bsd license. Understanding opensource and free software licensing medium. Another mistake, which has occasionally been seen since about 2008, is to assume that free software refers only to software licensed under copyleft licenses, since that is how the fsf typically releases software, while open source refers to software released under socalled permissive i. With a weaker copyleft than the lgpl, the eclipse license is more businessfriendly as it allows sub licensing and building of software made of epl and non epl even proprietary licensed code, provided the non epl code is a separate modules of software. All free software is open source software, but not all open source software is considered as free software. A is a legal process used by creators and inventors to protect their work and to control distribution of their product. The gnu free documentation license is another example of a copyleft non software license. It is a lax, permissive noncopyleft free software license. As a permissive license, it puts only very limited restriction on reuse and has, therefore, high license.

Find open source licenses and copyleft licensing to build a free, digital revolution and a copyleft, open. Since our products are commercial and not free our code is closed, we only integrate third party software that have non copyleft license. Categories of free and nonfree software gnu project. Just as the open source initiative certifies licenses as compliant with the open source definition, and the free software foundation defines licenses as free or non free software licenses and as copyleft or non copyleft licenses, so too does the copyfree initiative identify licenses. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project. How to choose the best license for your open source. The choice between copyleft and permissive free software licenses illustrates two fascinating points.

Copyleft licenses enforce the publication of the source code under the copyleft license. On selling exceptions to the gnu gpl free software. The open source initiative defines a permissive software license as a noncopyleft license. They basically say to use this software, you must promise not to sue us. Boost software license, by boost community, an opensource.

A major difference between the set of permissive and copyleft freesoftware licenses is that when the software is being redistributed either modified or unmodified, permissive licenses do not force the redistributor to open the modified source code. Most discussions of free software licenses bore listeners. To stop the industry from appropriating bits of the free code and integrating them into non public, industrial products, stallman invented the concept of copyleft and the gpl general public licence by which the author of a software. There are many possible ways to write copyleft distribution terms, so in principle there can be many copyleft free software licenses. Non copyleft licenses are considered as permissive licenses, mostly because they allow creating derivative works under other license terms.

Copyleft licensing is favourable for software coders. Copyleft versus noncopyleft licenses in free open source software. Gnu free documentation license simple english wikipedia. The berkley software distribution licenses is a non copyleft, permissive license. Noncopyleft licenses permit the code to be incorporated in software or programs that are distributed under some other license, including a proprietary one. Examples of noncopyleft free software licenses include the x11 license, apache license and the bsd licenses. A copyleft license permits embedding in a larger program only if the whole combined program is released under that license. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use.

See how to choose a license for your own work for general recommendations about choosing a license for your work the two major categories of free software license are copyleft and non copyleft. As software developers and publishers, when it comes to integrating third party software, we have to look carefully at the license. Sharealike is a synonym of copyleft in the creative commons vocabulary. Copyleft licenses are sometimes even considered to be nonfree because of the restrictions for redistribution of the works. Many free software licenses are not copyleft licenses because they do not require the licensee to distribute derivative works under the same license. Copyleft licenses such as the gnu gpl insist that modified versions of the program must be free software as well. The gnu free documentation license is a copyleft license for free documentation, designed by the free software foundation fsf for the gnu project. The most well known free software license that uses strong copyleft is the gnu general public license. The open source initiative defines a permissive software license as a non copyleft license.

Gnu general public license v3 gpl3 365223 code license managed by kevin. Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the open source definition in brief, they allow software to be freely used, modified, and shared. Open source licenses, copyleft documents, and antiintellectual property organizing. It is similar to the gnu general public license, giving readers the rights to copy, redistribute, and modify a work and requires all copies and derivatives to be available under the same license. The first form of copyleft licensing is called the gnu general public license. The answer is that while a strong copyleft license. Boost software license a permissive non copyleft free software license. It should be noted that, although people might think that copyleft. The other half was divided among non copyleft licenses, notably the mit license, and various licenses. This license is sometimes referred to as the 3clause bsd license.

It was made up by the free software foundation fsf for the gnu project. Categories of free and nonfree software gnu project free. On the other hand, mostrestrictive or strong copyleft licenses will be the dominant license. It does this by allowing non free or closed source programs to use. However, you want to be sure that you are not breaking the law by the way the software under opensource licenses is used in your project or app. It is a lax, permissive noncopyleft free software license, compatible with the gnu gpl. Some free software licenses dont establish an obligation of licensing derivative work in the same terms of the original work license. Ensuing copyleft provisions stated that when modified versions of free software are distributed, they must be distributed under the same terms as the original software. Our results suggest that leastrestrictive or non copyleft license will dominate other types of oss license when a large effort is required to develop derivative software.

File server web server security server mail server question id 268 which of the following are examples of desktop software. Since our products are commercial and not free our code is closed, we only integrate third party software that have noncopyleft license. The free software foundation recognizes the wtfpl as a gplcompatible free software license but does not recommend its use. Copyleft simple english wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Strong, weak and noncopyleft strong copyleft provisions can be imposed to all derived works which means that the first creator of the works has the most rights. Selling exceptions depends fundamentally on using a copyleft license, such as the gnu gpl, for the free software release. For information on specific free software licenses, see the license list page. The design science license is a strong copyleft license that can apply to any work that is not. It is important to make a difference between free software and open source software. This is a lax, permissive noncopyleft free software license, compatible with the gnu gpl. Copyleft is the idea and the specific stipulation when distributing software that the user will be able to copy it freely, examine and modify the source code, and redistribute the software to others free or priced as long as the redistributed software is also passed along with the copyleft. Examples of copyleft copyleft licenses ensure all future derivatives of the product to include the original copyleft word for word, thus keeping the product free whenever it changes. Strong copyleft also forbids linking or integration the subject work into larger worksprojects that are not also licensed with a license with compatible copyleft. The gnu free documentation license gnu fdl or simply gfdl is a copyleft license for open content such as software.

Most copyleft licenses are open source, but not all open source licenses. Copyleft is a distinguishing feature of some free software licenses. Free software licenses can be divided into two broad categories. The mit license is a permissive free software license originating at the massachusetts institute of technology mit in the late 1980s. How to choose the best license for your open source software project. The free software sharealike licenses written by richard stallman in the mid1980s pioneered a concept known as copyleft. By the end of the century, the gpl was the license of choice for approximately half of all opensource projects. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project free. You should read the license to understand its requirements for source code distribution. Free software foundation wikimili, the best wikipedia reader. After opting into the copyleft licence, the source code is readily available, and it allows others to modify and develop the code. Both copyleft and non copyleft permissive licenses for free content or free software can be used for things like documents for example books, art, music and software.

The revised bsd license 3 clause, and the simplified bsd license. Its important to note that there are no good or bad licenses, and that no one license is better. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. Its important to keep in mind that non copyleft licenses can transform from being free open source software to non free, non open source software licenses, because the enforcement of the. This license is often compared to copyleft free and open source software licenses. Bsd license problem gnu project free software foundation. In this way, copyleft licenses are distinct from other types of freesoftware licenses, which do not guarantee that. What are some examples of sharealikecopyleft licenses. There is an ongoing debate as to which class of license provides the greater degree of freedom.

We recommend that you not use this license for anything you write. Frequently answered questions open source initiative. Copyleft article about copyleft by the free dictionary. There are 3 bsd licenses, but only two accepted and recommended by the open source initiative and the fsf. All free software is open source software, but not all open source software.

The use of software licenses for non software work is generally discouraged. Studies on open source software oss have shown that the license under which an oss is released has an impact on the success or failure of the software. Linux essentials chapter 2 exam answer question id 267 the samba application is a. All types of information relating to open source licensing, open source agreements, the open source community, open source ideas, and other copyleft causes.